LYNEY mạnh và dễ chơi quá – fontaine ký sự # 3
LYNEY mạnh và dễ chơi quá – fontaine ký sự # 3

## AP®︎/College Calculus AB

• Worked example: Chain rule with table
• Chain rule with tables
• Derivative of aˣ (for any positive base a)
• Derivative of logₐx (for any positive base a≠1)
• Derivatives of aˣ and logₐx
• Worked example: Derivative of 7^(x²-x) using the chain rule
• Worked example: Derivative of log₄(x²+x) using the chain rule
• Worked example: Derivative of sec(3π/2-x) using the chain rule
• Worked example: Derivative of ∜(x³+4x²+7) using the chain rule
• Chain rule capstone
• Proving the chain rule
• Derivative rules review

Derivative of logₐx (for any positive base a≠1)

Now let’s look into the fascinating world of logarithms, exploring how to find the derivative of logₐx for any positive base a≠1. Leveraging the derivative of ln(x) and the change of base rule, we successfully differentiate log₇x and -3log_π(x). Join us on this mathematical journey!

## Want to join the conversation?

• When you take the derivative of log a (x), how do you know that 1/lna is a constant? Why isn’t lnx a constant.(11 votes)
• Because a is a constant and the logarithm (of any base) of a constant number is a constant. Say a=3, 1/ln(3) is just a number while ln x is a function, as x is a variable(28 votes)
• Atwhere is the proof for this log concept? in which lesson was it covered? 2:24(8 votes)
• Although he didn’t say it explicitly, Sal used the change of base formula to rewrite the given logarithmic expression log(base)(argument) as the ratio of ln(argument)/ln(base). All he did was change the original base from “a” to “e,” which is easy to differentiate using basic rules. This concept was covered back in Algebra 2, in this video lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra2/exponential-and-logarithmic-functions/change-of-base-formula-for-logarithms/v/change-of-base-formula(12 votes)
• Atwhy don’t we use the product rule for g(x) = -3 * log pi (x) or why is’nt -3 = 0 when grabbing the derivative of a constant 4:25(4 votes)
• You also could use the product rule, but because the derivative of a constant is 0, the first term “u'(x)*v(x)” in your result would disappear and you would be left with “u(x)*v'(x)” which is what we are doing anyway based on our differentiation rules.(14 votes)
• why the constant gets out of the d/dx ? for exemple d/dx[15 * log(x)] => 15 * d/dx[log(x)](4 votes)
• The derivative of a constant times a function is equal to the constant times the derivative of the function. This “constant multiple rule” follows from the similar rule for limits.(10 votes)
• Why can he move the 1/ln(x) out of the derivative operator?(5 votes)
• Are you talking about what Sal did at? He is moving 2:59`1/ln(a)`, which is a constant.(5 votes)
• is, xln(a) = ln(a^x)(4 votes)
• What if instead of having a logarithm in the form`log b (x)`, you have to differentiate a logarithm in the form`log x (a)`(where x is the variable which is to be differentiated with respect to and a is a constant). I was told by my Calculus teacher that this isn’t really a thing, but I’m interested in how it would be done anyways. Is there a way to do this?(3 votes)
• By the change of base formula for logarithms, we can write logᵪa as ln(a)/ln(x). Now this is just an application of chain rule, with ln(a)/x as the outer function. So the derivative is -ln(a)/((ln(x))²)·(1/x).
Alternatively, we can use implicit differentiation: given y=logᵪ(a), we write x^y=a.
The left-hand side is e^(ln(x^y)), or e^(y·ln(x)). Differentiating both sides now gives e^(y·ln(x))·[y’ln(x)+y/x]=0.
The exponential is never 0, so we can divide it out to get y’ln(x)+y/x=0
y’ln(x)=-y/x
y’=-y/(x·ln(x))
Replace y from the original equation and get -logᵪ(a)/(x·ln(x)). Rewriting the numerator with change of base formula gives the same result as from the first method.
I don’t know why your teacher told you this isn’t a thing; it’s a perfectly well-defined function.(6 votes)
• atwhy can’t we just use the quotient rule for ln(x)/ln(a) 2:57(3 votes)
• We could, but ln(a) is a constant, so its derivative is 0. We would get
[ln(a)·ln'(x)-ln(x)·0]/(ln(a))²
=ln(a)·ln'(x)/(ln(a))²
=ln'(x)/ln(a)
• even log(a)/log(b) equals to loga(b). During the exercise, I got a problem where 7^x, and log(7)7^x was an incorrect choice. Why does only Ln work and not Log_10, even though they both do the same thing?(2 votes)
• ln and log_10 are not the same thing. ln is a log with base e. log_10 is a logarithm with base 10.(2 votes)
• Isn’t there also another rule that you can apply? If it was log (base3)(x) it would be the derivative of x divided by x times that natural log of the base?(2 votes)
• I believe you are correct. I think the rule you are talking about is called the chain rule (correct me if you think I am misunderstanding). However, the derivative of x is one, which would make it 1/(x*ln(x)), which is exactly what was derived in the video.
I hope this has helped(1 vote)